27.6.2011
Alex stated that a crossing was to be found at the location opposite Morrison's in Gilmerton Road of which he'd spoken at the meeting in May, He spoke of the directional guidance device for sight- impaired and registered blind people being piloted in Edinburgh. He had used it and considered it to be superior to the current key operated system for pedestrian navigation as it helps bus stops and crossings.
Funding partners in the development and distribution of the device had included the, the Royal National Institute of the Blind (RNIB) ,Halcrow and Edinburgh city council, transport Scotland.
He stated that the exponential increase in rail passenger traffic in recent years was fuelling a campaign to re-open the South Suburban, Border and other similar rail routes. Currently disused stations in the Lothians such as Gorgie, Abbeyhill and Portobello and stations such as Newburgh ,in Fife East Linton in East Lothian and Renton in Berwickshire could all now be re-opened for passenger services.
He issued an information sheet which welcomed the extension of the Edinburgh to Bathgate line to Airdrie and also summarised the case for a high-speed link to Edinburgh from London King's Cross or using an existing service by diverting the West coast run from Euston during peak hours.
"The high speed link between Scotland England is to to be with us by 2032-2045 More should be done to bring Scotland into the 21st century on accessible rail travel."
Monday, July 25, 2011
Friday, May 6, 2011
Better Local Rail Services
Firstly we welcome the opening of the Bathgate Airdrie link and the line from Edinburgh to Helensburgh as this will change peoples lives in the future by joining up communities. It is hoped that the new Scottish Government can look positively at reopening stations and the lines that were closed down in the late sixties and there should be a timetable to do this over the next parliamentary term. They should also look at the following stations'Reston in BerwickshireEast Linton in East LothianNewbury in FifeGorgie, Abbeyhill and Portobello in Edinburgh and
It is hoped that they can reopen the South suburban line and join this up with the Fife circle line. The trains would do a figure of eight outer circle and inner circle. There should also be a connection between Edinburgh and St Andrews.During the festival they should see if they can run later services to Newcastle, Carlisle, Dundee, Stirling, Glasgow and all other stations in the central belt. At the moment the last direct train leaves London Kingscross at 6 pm and this should be put back to 7 30 pm or even 8 pm. More should be done to reduce the time to less than four hours on the east coast line. The high speed service on the west coast line could serve Edinburgh as well as Glasgow from Euston via Preston, Carlisle to Edinburgh during the peak period. This would not cost much and would save a considerable amount of travelling time from the centre of London to the centre of Edinburgh. A faster service would appeal to potential travellers who may otherwise opt to use the airlines.
The high speed link between London and Scotland is said to be with us by 2032-46. More should be done to bring Scotland into the 21st century on accessible rail travel. All these points should be taken into consideration by the Scottish government in co-operation with the UK Government.
Alex Scott MBE
It is hoped that they can reopen the South suburban line and join this up with the Fife circle line. The trains would do a figure of eight outer circle and inner circle. There should also be a connection between Edinburgh and St Andrews.During the festival they should see if they can run later services to Newcastle, Carlisle, Dundee, Stirling, Glasgow and all other stations in the central belt. At the moment the last direct train leaves London Kingscross at 6 pm and this should be put back to 7 30 pm or even 8 pm. More should be done to reduce the time to less than four hours on the east coast line. The high speed service on the west coast line could serve Edinburgh as well as Glasgow from Euston via Preston, Carlisle to Edinburgh during the peak period. This would not cost much and would save a considerable amount of travelling time from the centre of London to the centre of Edinburgh. A faster service would appeal to potential travellers who may otherwise opt to use the airlines.
The high speed link between London and Scotland is said to be with us by 2032-46. More should be done to bring Scotland into the 21st century on accessible rail travel. All these points should be taken into consideration by the Scottish government in co-operation with the UK Government.
Alex Scott MBE
Friday, January 22, 2010
Ferries Across the Firth of Forth
I am pleased that there is going to be a Hovverlink between Kirkcaldy and Portobello, Edinburgh, which will help ease congestion on the Forth Road Bridge as it will speed up journey times between Kirkcaldy and Edinburgh as the crossing will only take 25 minutes to cover the approximate 4 miles rather than people having to travel 32 miles by road.
However, I am very disappointed that this is not going to happen until 2012. On the Clyde there are a number of ferries and I think a similar scheme could be fully developed on the River Forth. For example, a roll-on-roll-off car ferry from Dunbar, East Lothian, to Anstruther, Fife or another suitable ferry terminal on the Neuk of Fife for this purpose, which may require redevelopment of the harbours. This would also require road infrastructure from the Fife coast to the M90 to be improved.
It is approximately 17? miles between Dunbar and Anstruther and it is 87 miles around the coast, and this would save on the carbon footprint and heat spots with transport going round and through Edinburgh and would be cost saving from the north of England to the North East of Scotland and Highlands and would also open up tourism throughout Fife and southeast Scotland. This would be one way of boosting the economy and help increase employment.
I also support a passenger service from Burntisland to Granton (a crossing distance of less than four miles against a road distance of 19.9 miles)which should allow people to park their cars and travel without stress in congestion to and from Edinburgh and also this could be part of an integrated public transport system where one ticket allows travel on buses in Fife and Edinburgh as well as the ferry.
All the above would help to ease the flow of traffic in and around Edinburgh and Fife and would help the environment by reducing carbon emissions.
However, I am very disappointed that this is not going to happen until 2012. On the Clyde there are a number of ferries and I think a similar scheme could be fully developed on the River Forth. For example, a roll-on-roll-off car ferry from Dunbar, East Lothian, to Anstruther, Fife or another suitable ferry terminal on the Neuk of Fife for this purpose, which may require redevelopment of the harbours. This would also require road infrastructure from the Fife coast to the M90 to be improved.
It is approximately 17? miles between Dunbar and Anstruther and it is 87 miles around the coast, and this would save on the carbon footprint and heat spots with transport going round and through Edinburgh and would be cost saving from the north of England to the North East of Scotland and Highlands and would also open up tourism throughout Fife and southeast Scotland. This would be one way of boosting the economy and help increase employment.
I also support a passenger service from Burntisland to Granton (a crossing distance of less than four miles against a road distance of 19.9 miles)which should allow people to park their cars and travel without stress in congestion to and from Edinburgh and also this could be part of an integrated public transport system where one ticket allows travel on buses in Fife and Edinburgh as well as the ferry.
All the above would help to ease the flow of traffic in and around Edinburgh and Fife and would help the environment by reducing carbon emissions.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Letters to the Editor - Waverley Line
I have recently had a letter about the delays in the re-opening of the Waverley Line published by three newspapers, which are:
The Scotsman
Edinburgh Evening News
The Southern Reporter
Below is a copy of the letter submitted to the papers, which was slightly editted by them for publication. The letter was sent to them on 12 October 2009.
"Dear Editor
I am concerned in the delays in the reconstruction of the Waverley Line and feel more pressure should be put on the Scottish Government to provide us with a starting date for work to commence from both ends of the line which should commence simultaneously at both Edinburgh and Carlisle.
Your readers may be interested to known of two groups on ww.facebook.com which are
“The Waverley Line + Borders Rail Link Edinburgh Galashiels Carlisle” and “Get the Scottish Borders Linked by Rail to Edinburgh”
These groups support the re-opening of rail links between Edinburgh and Carlisle and I would encourage your readers to join in the campaign to ensure that more people know of the need for this link.
Yours sincerely
Alex Scott MBE"
Following the publication of the letter the number of people signed up to the Facebook groups mentioned has increased greatly.
There has also been some increase in the interest in the subject and other people have responded with their opinions in later editions of newspapers.
The Scotsman
Edinburgh Evening News
The Southern Reporter
Below is a copy of the letter submitted to the papers, which was slightly editted by them for publication. The letter was sent to them on 12 October 2009.
"Dear Editor
I am concerned in the delays in the reconstruction of the Waverley Line and feel more pressure should be put on the Scottish Government to provide us with a starting date for work to commence from both ends of the line which should commence simultaneously at both Edinburgh and Carlisle.
Your readers may be interested to known of two groups on ww.facebook.com which are
“The Waverley Line + Borders Rail Link Edinburgh Galashiels Carlisle” and “Get the Scottish Borders Linked by Rail to Edinburgh”
These groups support the re-opening of rail links between Edinburgh and Carlisle and I would encourage your readers to join in the campaign to ensure that more people know of the need for this link.
Yours sincerely
Alex Scott MBE"
Following the publication of the letter the number of people signed up to the Facebook groups mentioned has increased greatly.
There has also been some increase in the interest in the subject and other people have responded with their opinions in later editions of newspapers.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
East Coast Mainline - High Speed Rail Link - Edinburgh to London
I believe that there should be a high speed rail link on the East Coast Mainline route connecting London-Leeds-Newcastle-Edinburgh and Glasgow with improvements in the lines to Inverness, Aberdeen and other Scottish towns with more dual tracking and extended electrification which should be started within the next five years.
This high-speed link, along with the other improvements would, bring many advantages for businesses, users and the environment by encouraging traffic from the roads. the time taken from the centre of Edinburgh to the centre of London using the high-speed link would be much less than travelling from the centre of Edinburgh to the airport and then flying to London and then onwards into the city centre.
I think this would save time, stress and damage to the environment. You just have to look at the system that they use in France, for example the TGV rail system from Paris to Lyon.
From now on all rail lines ie the tracks and rolling-stock should be built and developed within the UK in order to preserve and create jobs for British workers.
All the stations and trains should be made accessible by having a universal information system which can be used by blind and disabled people. All trains should have a standard layout for buttons.
This would give us an intergrated transport system which would be accessible to all and fit for the 21st century.
This high-speed link, along with the other improvements would, bring many advantages for businesses, users and the environment by encouraging traffic from the roads. the time taken from the centre of Edinburgh to the centre of London using the high-speed link would be much less than travelling from the centre of Edinburgh to the airport and then flying to London and then onwards into the city centre.
I think this would save time, stress and damage to the environment. You just have to look at the system that they use in France, for example the TGV rail system from Paris to Lyon.
From now on all rail lines ie the tracks and rolling-stock should be built and developed within the UK in order to preserve and create jobs for British workers.
All the stations and trains should be made accessible by having a universal information system which can be used by blind and disabled people. All trains should have a standard layout for buttons.
This would give us an intergrated transport system which would be accessible to all and fit for the 21st century.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Campaign to save DLA and Attendance Allowance
I recently had this message passed to me via a friend who received it from the Benefits and Work website: http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk
I would be pleased if you would consider supporting this campaign.
Alex Scott
"This week we’re asking you to take the argument to the government by posting your opinions on their official green paper website. By doing this you will be contributing to the consultation process and your views– according to the government – will be taken into account when they begin work on drawing up the white paper due out next year. We think it’s vital that you do contribute because, otherwise, you’ll be leaving it to others to speak on your behalf and they may not say quite what you want to say or with quite the passion that you might want to say it.
We also think it’s important that the green paper website reflects what sick and disabled claimants actually do think, rather than what anyone else would like to claim you think. There are lots of places on the Big Care Debate website where you can have your say. All comments are moderated, so if you say anything especially rude or potentially defamatory it’s unlikely to be publishedWe suggest you either use the Executive Summary page here:
http://careandsupport.direct.gov.uk/greenpaper/execsum/
or the Having Your say page here:
http://careandsupport.direct.gov.uk/greenpaper/execsum/having-your-say/
You are asked to give your name and email address. Your name will be published on the site but your email address won’t. If you want more details about the confidentiality policy for this consultation you can find them on the Having your say page, under the sub-heading ‘Confidentiality of information’. As usual, we’re not going to tell people what to write. There are lots of contributions from claimants on the green paper website already, so you can see what others have written. You may also be able to copy and paste things you’ve written to your MP or disability organisations into the feedback box, if appropriate.
The issue we’ve been campaigning about is the proposal to hand disability benefits over to local authorities. But there are lots of other issues in the green paper you may also wish to comment on. For example, there is the fact that the government have ruled out using taxes to pay for care (Option 5 of the funding options) before the ‘Big debate’ has even begun. Lots of people think general taxation is the right way to pay for care and that it’s wrong to take this option off the table before people have even been consulted.
THE CAMPAIGN SO FAR
A huge amount has been achieved in an astonishingly short space of time. Information about the threat to disability benefits has been published on many hundreds of websites, forums and blogs. Over 21,000 people have signed up to the campaign. All the major disability charities, and the vast majority of the smaller ones are now very aware of this issue. This, for example, comes from the Arthritis Care website:
“A large number of people with arthritis have expressed concern to us about Government proposals to remove Attendance Allowance (AA) benefits, as part of a wider review of social care services. Both AA and Disability Living Allowance (DLA) offer nationally-set, non-means tested benefits which are often vitally important to help keep people with arthritis active, independent and in work wherever possible. Arthritis Care is opposed to any attempts to remove or subsume such benefits into mainstream social care services.”
The full statement is available here:
http://www.arthritiscare.org.uk/campaigns/currentissues/socialcarereform
There’s also unlikely to be an MP in the UK who hasn’t heard from constituents about this issue. Replies have begun trickling in from them already. For example, labour MP David Drew has emailed a constituent to say:
“Like you I have serious misgivings about interfering with DLA and Attendance Allowance and particularly the introduction of means testing.”
Remember, if you’re not a member of Benefits and Work and so can’t post on our forum, you can post replies from MP or anyone else at the newly established welfare watch website at:
http://welfarewatch.myfineforum.org/index.php
So . . . disability organisations informed . . . MPs quizzed . . . if we can now get a thousand or more responses on the green paper website, then all the major avenues for consultation will have been covered. There are other things happening too. In Cornwall today, for example, there’s a public petition signing going on at Lemon Quay in Truro from 12.00 – 3.30pm. The event is being covered by Radio Cornwall. More details of this and other possible petition signing days from:
http://www.politicalcripple.com/d/
We’ve also no doubt that someone will get a petition put on the No 10 website as soon as it opens for business on 7 September. And we’ve heard from people who came across the campaign from letters and articles in their local paper, so there’s no doubt that it’s worth the effort of contacting your local media. Well done to everyone who’s managed to get coverage so far, do keep it up.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
For the present, we won’t be sending out any more emails asking you to do things simply because you’ve achieved in a few weeks more than we expected to achieve in months. But we do think it’s vital that disability charities actually seek members views and actively campaign on this issue. So keep the pressure up and let us know if you think they’re not being proactive enough. We’ll do our best to keep you informed by email of any developments between now and November 13th, when the consultation ends. We’ll then delete this mailing list –we won’t hold on to your details. But you’ll still be very welcome to sign up to our free monthly newsletter if you haven’t already, so that you can keep yourself informed about what’s happening. Meanwhile, please do visit the green paper website and let them hear, loud and clear, what you think.
Good luck,
Steve Donnison"
I would be pleased if you would consider supporting this campaign.
Alex Scott
"This week we’re asking you to take the argument to the government by posting your opinions on their official green paper website. By doing this you will be contributing to the consultation process and your views– according to the government – will be taken into account when they begin work on drawing up the white paper due out next year. We think it’s vital that you do contribute because, otherwise, you’ll be leaving it to others to speak on your behalf and they may not say quite what you want to say or with quite the passion that you might want to say it.
We also think it’s important that the green paper website reflects what sick and disabled claimants actually do think, rather than what anyone else would like to claim you think. There are lots of places on the Big Care Debate website where you can have your say. All comments are moderated, so if you say anything especially rude or potentially defamatory it’s unlikely to be publishedWe suggest you either use the Executive Summary page here:
http://careandsupport.direct.gov.uk/greenpaper/execsum/
or the Having Your say page here:
http://careandsupport.direct.gov.uk/greenpaper/execsum/having-your-say/
You are asked to give your name and email address. Your name will be published on the site but your email address won’t. If you want more details about the confidentiality policy for this consultation you can find them on the Having your say page, under the sub-heading ‘Confidentiality of information’. As usual, we’re not going to tell people what to write. There are lots of contributions from claimants on the green paper website already, so you can see what others have written. You may also be able to copy and paste things you’ve written to your MP or disability organisations into the feedback box, if appropriate.
The issue we’ve been campaigning about is the proposal to hand disability benefits over to local authorities. But there are lots of other issues in the green paper you may also wish to comment on. For example, there is the fact that the government have ruled out using taxes to pay for care (Option 5 of the funding options) before the ‘Big debate’ has even begun. Lots of people think general taxation is the right way to pay for care and that it’s wrong to take this option off the table before people have even been consulted.
THE CAMPAIGN SO FAR
A huge amount has been achieved in an astonishingly short space of time. Information about the threat to disability benefits has been published on many hundreds of websites, forums and blogs. Over 21,000 people have signed up to the campaign. All the major disability charities, and the vast majority of the smaller ones are now very aware of this issue. This, for example, comes from the Arthritis Care website:
“A large number of people with arthritis have expressed concern to us about Government proposals to remove Attendance Allowance (AA) benefits, as part of a wider review of social care services. Both AA and Disability Living Allowance (DLA) offer nationally-set, non-means tested benefits which are often vitally important to help keep people with arthritis active, independent and in work wherever possible. Arthritis Care is opposed to any attempts to remove or subsume such benefits into mainstream social care services.”
The full statement is available here:
http://www.arthritiscare.org.uk/campaigns/currentissues/socialcarereform
There’s also unlikely to be an MP in the UK who hasn’t heard from constituents about this issue. Replies have begun trickling in from them already. For example, labour MP David Drew has emailed a constituent to say:
“Like you I have serious misgivings about interfering with DLA and Attendance Allowance and particularly the introduction of means testing.”
Remember, if you’re not a member of Benefits and Work and so can’t post on our forum, you can post replies from MP or anyone else at the newly established welfare watch website at:
http://welfarewatch.myfineforum.org/index.php
So . . . disability organisations informed . . . MPs quizzed . . . if we can now get a thousand or more responses on the green paper website, then all the major avenues for consultation will have been covered. There are other things happening too. In Cornwall today, for example, there’s a public petition signing going on at Lemon Quay in Truro from 12.00 – 3.30pm. The event is being covered by Radio Cornwall. More details of this and other possible petition signing days from:
http://www.politicalcripple.com/d/
We’ve also no doubt that someone will get a petition put on the No 10 website as soon as it opens for business on 7 September. And we’ve heard from people who came across the campaign from letters and articles in their local paper, so there’s no doubt that it’s worth the effort of contacting your local media. Well done to everyone who’s managed to get coverage so far, do keep it up.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
For the present, we won’t be sending out any more emails asking you to do things simply because you’ve achieved in a few weeks more than we expected to achieve in months. But we do think it’s vital that disability charities actually seek members views and actively campaign on this issue. So keep the pressure up and let us know if you think they’re not being proactive enough. We’ll do our best to keep you informed by email of any developments between now and November 13th, when the consultation ends. We’ll then delete this mailing list –we won’t hold on to your details. But you’ll still be very welcome to sign up to our free monthly newsletter if you haven’t already, so that you can keep yourself informed about what’s happening. Meanwhile, please do visit the green paper website and let them hear, loud and clear, what you think.
Good luck,
Steve Donnison"
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Save our Resource Centre, George IV Bridge, Edinburgh
I've created a group on Facebook called "Save our Resource Centre".
We are asking for your support to help save this service.
This group has been created due to concern over the future of the Resource Centre for blind, deaf, physically disabled and senior citizens at the Central Library, George IV Bridge, Edinburgh.
The Resource Centre provides computers with voice and magnification software to make the machines accessible and staff to provide one to one support.
The Resource Centre is well appreciated by all who use it, and they like coming to a central point, which is well served by Public transport. They appreciate the opportunity to drop in without appointment, as most would be unable to use the mainstream services. The clients are given as much individual time as they need, which would not be possible without a dedicated team and dedicated machines.
We are asking for your support to help save this service.
This group has been created due to concern over the future of the Resource Centre for blind, deaf, physically disabled and senior citizens at the Central Library, George IV Bridge, Edinburgh.
The Resource Centre provides computers with voice and magnification software to make the machines accessible and staff to provide one to one support.
The Resource Centre is well appreciated by all who use it, and they like coming to a central point, which is well served by Public transport. They appreciate the opportunity to drop in without appointment, as most would be unable to use the mainstream services. The clients are given as much individual time as they need, which would not be possible without a dedicated team and dedicated machines.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)